« This is how I talk about the Superbowl | Main | Much Love for Love »

What's YOUR guilty pleasure?

On the cover of Newsweek is a photo of Britney Spears and Paris Hilton looking very drunk and trashy (shocking!). The accompanying article is called Girls Gone Bad and it poses some interesting questions about how these celebrities (?) are shaping our culture.

This is the thing: I’m fascinated by celebrity culture, and I'm not talking about the good stuff, in which so-and-so has their own charity and so-and-so won at Sundance. I'm talkin' the CRAP, the trash, the Who Passed Out at the Ivy. Christopher says, “You are part of the problem!” when I come home with US magazine and he’s right, he’s right, I KNOW he’s right, but I CANNOT STOP. I know who’s getting divorced and who’s screwing who and who’s knocked up (alledgedly, ‘cause you know half those stories aren’t true) and honestly, it really BOTHERS me that I know all that! Just saying it makes me want to launch into a whole discussion about Twentieth Century Western Literature so y’all will know I am halfway intelligent. I want to name-drop all the indie bands in my music library: Here’s the Dresdon Dolls, the Flaming Lips, Hot Chip and Imogen Heap and Sleater-Kinney and Radiohead! Here! Here! Here is my subscription to Venus, to Punk Planet! “You know what I did last night?” I want to tell you, “I went to a play it was in a theater I go to the theater a lot I’m cultured!” as if to counteract the horrible admission that, yes, I know A. who Nicole Ritchie is currently dating (Joel Madden) B. who he dated before Nicole Ritchie (Hillary Duff) and C. what Hillary Duff said about Nicole Ritchie (she’s a “skank”) (in my defense, I’m not sure who Joel Madden is. And I know Duff is one of the little blonde ones but I’m not sure what she does. And Nicole Ritchie really is a skank, but I mean that not in relation to her sexual prowess but because she got a million dollar book contract [uhm, why? Because Dancing on the Ceiling was a really good SONG?] and I hate it that the publishing industry is going that way [although, didja know that her publisher, Judith Reagan, was the same one who just went down in flames for the whole heinous OJ Simpson hypothetical murder confession book? The same Judith Reagan told to suck it in the acknowledgments section of Hairstyles of the Damned? I CHEERED when that woman hit rock bottom; I cracked a bottle of f’ing champagne!]). When I was still waiting tables, I did this thing to pass time where’d I’d ask all my customers one question a day, sort of an informal survey: “What’s your favorite Eighties song?” “How many times has your heart been broken?” And, “What’s your guilty pleasure?” While my favorite answer was, “Judge Judy,” the most popular answer by FAR was, “Celebrity Culture.” So, it’s not just me, right? Do you read those magazines? Do you sneak a peak at People.com? Are you affected by trash media? I’m interested in articles like Girls Gone Bad because they try to look at not only WHY we’re so affected, but also what EFFECT that affection might have on our culture.

Okay, Britney and Paris. And Lindsay and Nicole and the rest of you. Here we go.

My first thought: where are their parents? If I paraded around like these girls do my mother would’ve slapped me into boarding school so fast I wouldn’t have time to pack and my dad—My DAD! I SHUDDER to imagine my father waiting in line for groceries and seeing a such a photo of me on Newsweek!—would just lock me up on the island (if you’re new to this blog, my dad lives on a small island in the middle of the Gulf of Alaska, on which there is only one grocery store, but there are still trash magazines at the counter. Trash magazines, it seems, can travel anywhere. You can probably get US magazine in Darfur, no matter that they can’t even get medical supplies). I’m thinking of all the novels where the girls do something bad and their parents send them to the convent except maybe that’s not a great example ‘cause usually those girls came out of the nunnery wilder than when they went in. Here’s the thing, though: when I read those novels, I always feel a great sense of injustice that those girls are being locked up. I think the parents are very old fashioned and behind the times and cruel to not let their daughters live and love and express their independence. I think, thank GOD the world has changed—

Sidebar: this is where I say I feel very lucky to live in this country, where women’s rights HAVE changed because it certainly isn’t the case everywhere. I just finished Reading Lolita in Tehran and was amazed by the things I take for granted. For example, I teach at a University, and I can just WALK IN! TO MY OFFICE! Through the same door as my male colleagues and male students! Women in Iran (students AND faculty) have to walk through a little side door where they are “inspected” before being allowed to attend classes:

“’I would first be checked to see if I have the right clothes: the color of my coat, the length of my uniform, the thickness of my scarf, the form of my shoes, the objects in my bag, the visible traces of even the mildest make-up, the size of my rings and their level of attractiveness, all would be checked before I could enter the campus of the university, the same university in which men also study. And to them the main door, with its immense portals and emblems and flags, is generously open’” (Azar Nafisi, Reading Lolita in Tehran, pg. 29).

Ladies, imagine: walking into the 623 S. Michigan Building of Columbia College and having to go through a different door than the guys, and having your person checked before you’re allowed to attend class? This is just one example, but it stuck with me ‘cause EVERY DAY I walk through that door.

I was talking with a friend about this and she said, “I had no IDEA! Why don’t they tell us things like this?”

“Who is ‘us’?” I asked her. “And who is ‘they’?” The Iranian government? Iranian women? American journalists? Is CNN going to report the little day-to-day goings on when there are bombs exploding all over the damn place? Here’s my theory: fiction should be the news and the news should be fiction. Seriously, I read a novel and learn about the world. I turn on the news, or look at the cover of Newsweek, and there’s A. Britney B. Anna Nicole Smith (drugs! Problems with her weight! Who’s the father of her child!) and C. (my favorite) MARRIED MOTHER-OF-THREE ASTRONAUT (Yes! Astronaut! One of NASA’s FINEST!) DRIVES CROSS-COUNTRY WEARING ADULT DIAPER (so she wouldn’t have to pull over to use the bathroom!) AND PEPPER-SPRAYS (!!!!) THE ROMANTIC INTEREST OF ANOTHER ASTRONAUT THAT SHE HAS A CRUSH ON!! Do you all realize that I could’ve written that story? That’s something that I would make up in my crazy brain and tell over cocktails ‘cause it’s just so goddamn hilarious!

Where was I?

Here: when I read novels about girls getting locked up by their parents, I feel a great sense of injustice. When I see Britney and Paris parading around, tossing around underwear and money and money and money and MONEY, clogging around the airways with shitty music (Dear Bloodshy and Avant, producers of Britney Spears’ song TOXIC: That is a really good song. You did well. It’s not your fault that she’s so sucky. You keep making good music but please find niftier people to perform it. Thank-you), I want somebody to ground them both for the next twenty years—no internet, no Blackberries, no boys. I don’t care where, just let there be decent supervision, positive role models and a limited line of credit, and if that means a nunnery, then fine, get thee to it.

This brings me to my second question: am I just getting old? ‘Cause I’m sure my mother said similar things about Madonna and Cyndi Lauper, both of whom, I feel, are great artists who made great musical contributions, and I’m sure my grandmother said similar things about Nina Simone with her song, “I want a little sugar in my bowl,” (which is a kickass number if you’ve never heard it).

ALSO: in the photo montage accompanying the Girls Gone Bad article, they compare Britney and Paris to other “Bad Girls” who have influenced pop culture. Some examples: MARY MAGDALENE (!!!!!!!!!!!!!) Catherine the Great (!!!!) Mae West (!!!!) Ingrid Bergman (!!!!) Betty Paige (!!!!) Marilyn Monroe (!!!) Eartha Kitt (!!!!) and I’m like, are you people SERIOUSLY comparing Paris f’ing Hilton to Catherine the GREAT! TO MARY MAGDALENE! Many of those women are attributed with individual and/or sexual liberation, women who, were I to see them in a bar, I’d be all, “Mary Magdalene, you paved the way for a lot of the freedoms I enjoy today. Can I buy you a Makers and water?” whereas if I were to see Paris in a bar, I’d probably roll my eyes and ask for the check (if I ran into Britney in a bar, I’d say: “Go home to your children, missy, and also put some clothes on! And also wash your face! And did I mention go home to your children? GO HOME TO YOUR CHILDREN!”) bringing me to my third question: is individual/sexual freedom now being pushed too far? Where is the line between pushing the envelope (Mae West doing nudey shows in a time when women weren’t allowed to acknowledge they were sexual beings) and abusing the privilege (Paris Hilton doing [what exactly does she do?] in a time when naked women wash cars in string bikinis in order to sell hamburgers [oh yes! THAT’S what she did!]).

I read an article a couple days ago called Why Should We Care About Anna Nicole (‘cause I wanted someone to explain to me why I do), which pointed out the American fascination with beauty and dysfunction. I can buy into that. I’m certainly fascinated with beauty and dysfunction, but there has GOT better ways to go about it. For example, Anna Karenenna--in my opinion, the greatest story EVER!--is as beautifully dysfunctional as they get, but also she’s waaaay more interesting than any of these celebrity bubble gum princesses, maybe because with Anna K. we get the whole dirty, complicated, wild, tragic story with all its honesty and intesnity and emotional layers and with Anna N.S. we’ll only ever get the surface: the drugs, boobs and Trimfast. Maybe the difference is how much we’re willing to commit to their stories: we think we know NS after seeing one photo, or a slurred awards appearance on YouTube, but to get to know Anna Karenenna you’ve got to get through some 400 pages of history which, in the end, is the only way to really know the truth: read the whole goddamn story. NOT a paragraph in some glossy mag, but the whole story. The little day-to-day things. What they have to go through to walk through a door.

In the Girls Gone Bad article they discuss the thousands of teenage girls who are influenced by Britney and Paris. Someday (in the very near future if not, like, tomorrow) those girls will be sitting in my classroom.

Question number four: what on Earth do I say to them?

I don’t have answers for any of these questions, except for the obvious: the only way Britney and Paris and all this bullshit will go away is if I stop reading about them. It’s my choice, and I’m choosing: starting now, I’m going on a one-month hiatus from celebrity culture. A test-run, if you will: no magazines, no internet, no Entertainment Tonight.

Maybe the real question is: is that even POSSIBLE?

Comments

Perhaps if they made a separate women's entrance for the 624 building (maybe even separate elevators too), the lobby wouldn't get so crowded.

Of course, that's not the point you were making, but I sure do wish there were more elevators in that building so there wasn't such a traffic jam before all the 6:30pm classes.

Listen, I think you're a great writer, and I can certainly identify with your interest in celeb trash culture. I've wasted many a morn on sites such as Go Fug Yourself and People.com and Pink is the New Blog. I count myself as moral because I will never click on a link in any gossip blog that promises something that might take my innocence away forever, like Cisco (ex of some actress I've never acually watched, but apparently used to be on the O.C.) naked and (yuckily, apparently) exposed. You begin to find that these gossipy stories travel in chains -- so that now People.com (the CNN of gossip) is subtly talking about Cisco's balls as the reason for his breakup with Mischa (sp?).

I never feel good reading this shit ... I'm curious, but in the end I don't like myself for giving in. The fact that you brought up Tolstoy in the same blog-essay-esque as Paris and Nicole is really depressing. I just think you are too good for this nonsense -- and that it ultimately distracts from your talent and focus. I say this because I know it distracts from my own focus. (I also write.)
My boyfriend hates it when I buy an Us Weekly (I tell him it's because I want a new haircut and I'm looking for a picture to take to the stylist, as if that is entirely logical) --- but I think the boyfriends and husbands might be right. One can try to make a cultrual critique of the mess, but is it really worth it to spend energy on? Unless you just go all out...? A woman featured on the John Stewart show (can't remember her name right now) just wrote a book about girl "raunch culture" that sounds great. I got the sense that it was about celebrity girls (Paris and Girls Gone Wild college women) learning to pretend/affect this idea of pleasure without really feeling it... if that makes sense .... Anyway, it all turns out to be quite complicated, doesn't it? And here I am with Shakespeare due and I'm on my way to see Factory Girl. That about sums it up, friends.
(apologies for spelling errors-- I was inspired to type this in 15ish seconds flat.)

Joel Madden is a member of Good Charlotte, a whinny, glossy pop-punk group that I swore I didn't like in high school but secretly did.

They did a commercial for a videogame played with bongos, once.

You're starting this the week after Anna Nicole Smith's death? Before we've found out the cause or the father of Danielynn? Sigh. As you know, this subject is dear to my heart. I can't disagree with anything you say, and I've not paid money for an US mag or the like in some time since the same stuff is free on the internet. Anyway, I say the same thing. Where are their parents??? I don't know. I don't know. The scary thing is that now some of them ARE the parents.

I just know there is someone out there somewhere willing to paint Mary Magdalane knocking back a Makers and water with you.

Have you ever read 'Persepolis' by Marjane Satrapi? It's a graphic novel about a young girl and her family coping with the fundamentalist revolution in Iran. Considering the current sabre rattling between our two countries, it seems important to hang around in Iranian artists' heads as much as possible...

my theory is that celebrity culture is america's highly masked schadenfreud. As american's we feel we are too sensitive for pure enjoyment in other people's misery, so instead we mask it as idolotry. Everyone knows that those we hold to high standards (mel gibson, the virgin britney spears, the happily married nick and jessica) are no where near as perfect as we construct them, and they fail. They get drunk and scream racist slurs at police officers, they get drunk and married in las vegas, the break up and fight in magazines. This is where the true enjoyment begins, this is why we spent so much time building them up. A happy functional celebrity is boring, a tragically dead celebrity with a baby daughter that everyone claims to have fathered, that is front page news. It delights us and entertains us, because we can say "i may only have twenty dollars to my name, and I may have missed my train, but at least I am not them".
It isn't good, at is may be healthier to laugh at the buisness man who just fell on his ass in the snow, but that isn't on every newstand.

I also think the husbands are right.

I successfully cut out celebrity crap, then realized that I cold personalize my google homepage with people.com and feel less dirty clicking on a link than paying for a mag or typing a url. Of course, I feel dirty admitting it right now.

I think it is great that you put Anna K. in the same posting as Anna N.S. because they are both a part of our culture. I appreciate that addressing them together makes literature more accessible. You like the messiness of celebrity culture? Great. Read this 'cuz I bet you'll like it too. I don't think that Tolstoy should be reserved for those who deem themselves worthy and above the nonsense of popular culture. Speaking about all of this in the intelligent manner you do makes great literature seem less elitist and more real. I believe that reading teaches us about ourselves and our world and this gift should be introduced in a way that invites rather than intimidates. This post has the power to inspire someone to pick up Anna K. who would have previously been too scared.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)